Can You Write an Equation That Gives the Worst-case Response Time, Given N Jobs?
Update Jan 7, 2022: The numbers in the Kingdom of denmark study described beneath are now confirmed by government data from Germany showing that vaccinated people are 8X more likely to develop Omicron than unvaccinated people. This is not surprising since a paper from Germany showed the aforementioned matter: the more y'all vaccinate, the worse it gets.
Worried about Omicron? Guess what? Later on 90 days, the vaccine they gave you lot is going to brand you More likely to get infected from Omicron, not less. The longer you stay on the vaccine treadmill, the harder to go off in the time to come and the easier yous'll get in for the virus.
In brusk, nosotros've been lied to virtually the vaccine. It is protecting you lot less and less over time. While you may get a benefit for earlier variants, the benefit for other variants (and likely other diseases) is going to be negative. In short, you are getting a short term benefit against Delta, but at the expense of a deposition of your overall immunity to everything else.
These vaccines may aid you win the state of war against a variant that may soon be rare, but the price you pay is that you lot make your immunity to everything else worse. It's a dumb tradeoff (peculiarly since early treatments work so well). But the people making the laws won't believe any of the science referenced in this commodity, so information technology will continue.
Alix Mayer alerted me to this game changing tweet nearly a study in Denmark which instantly went viral every bit you can see from the number of retweets:
I desire to tell y'all what this actually means and how it is beingness attacked.
Summary: Decline to comply with mandates. Now.
This newspaper means nosotros will need to inject people every 30 days if nosotros want to "protect" them. Based on the harm that the vaccines do to our allowed arrangement, it's likely that the needed interval will shorten with each booster.
If people don't get additional as required, they will be MORE vulnerable to Delta and Omicron than if they weren't vaccinated. That'south what NEGATIVE vaccine efficacy means. It doesn't hateful the protection wears off (like we were told). It means the OPPOSITE of what y'all were told: it means the vaccines helps the virus to infect you (past suppressing your allowed system, probably permanently each fourth dimension we are injected according to Dr. Ryan Cole). It means we were lied to.
![](https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F77ba3a66-d0bf-4369-bc3b-b301118c3970_924x1155.png)
In short, the vaccine is similar a heroin addiction: once you've had a taste of it, you are hooked: you take to keep it for life if you want protection. If yous end information technology, you're a sitting duck for the virus.
What's worse is our government is mandating this now. In light of this paper, they will change the vaccine mandates to strength you to get vaccinated every month or you lot volition be fired from your job. Their next movement could well be to go far illegal not to be vaccinated. This seems like where things are headed based on what is happening in other countries where they are apace stripping away your rights to do anything without a vaccination.
And we have no inkling what monthly (and later weekly) vaccination will practice to your body. This has never been tested.
My advice is simple. If you lot have been vaccinated, you need to stop now. Do not get the booster. My friend Dr. Robert Malone is addicted of repeating the sometime aphorism, "When yous find yourself in a pigsty, stop excavation ."
Sadly, most people cannot afford to lose their jobs, and so they will get vaccinated and medical professionals will not speak out since doing then volition crusade them to lose their license.
The faster, safer, lower price way to finish the pandemic
Everyone needs to stop listening to the CDC now and get-go listening to people who accept been maxim to ditch the vaccines and aggressively promote early treatment with repurposed drugs.
The entire pandemic will end as before long equally the CDC stops ignoring the existing early treatment protocols which have been available since March 2022 (Fareed and Tyson protocol was commencement available dorsum then). Masking, vaccines, mandates, lockdowns, and social distancing were never needed. We could accept (and nevertheless can) end the hospitalization and decease with just one matter: early treatment. Just like Nippon has done. But the CDC refused to listen.
What the paper said in detail
Starting time, the link in the tweet is to the outdated version of the paper. The current version can be found here.
Start at the comments, both from social media and also from medrxiv readers.
Bank check out the social media portion of the comments
Here are some comments (on erstwhile and new version of the paper):
-
And so assume the results y'all like (high VE for recent vaccination) are causal, only manus wave confounders at results you lot don't like (negative VE for afar vaccination)? Science?
-
This is a superb paper, especially the careful arroyo to CNV calling and the Bayesian methods used throughout.
-
Looking at the graphs, I see both vaccines lose all effectiveness at ninety days, merely worse, actually drop into strong negative effectiveness after that fourth dimension.
This would mean that these vaccines *increment* one's chances of infection after the initial xc days "honeymoon" period.
Am I getting this right?
If then, why are governments pushing third doses as Omicron is becoming ascendant?
The key material is in the full PDF:
![](https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ff71804ac-6465-498d-b75b-9bc7f2aff866_978x1029.png)
The graphs to a higher place tell the story. Negative VE means the vaccine is helping the virus, not you lot.
And then at sixty days, the protection is shut to naught, and then if you want to maintain protection, getting vaccinated every 30 days is required.
This isn't a vaccine at all. This is basically stimulating your immune system so information technology is already "geared up" to fight the virus. That's not what a vaccine is supposed to do.
Furthermore, the negative VE after ninety days means you are hooked for life and I would approximate (based on the mechanism of action), that we will need shorter and shorter dosing intervals for every booster you get (since information technology kills off your immune system every time).
And so it could very well be monthly boosters after the 2nd dose, weekly boosters later on the 3rd dose, and perhaps daily boosters after the 4th dose to maintain your "immunity."
You can't terminate after that because if y'all finish, you're in worse shape than if you never started.
The stunning determination of the paper
In light of the exponential rise in Omicron cases, these findings highlight the need for massive rollout of vaccinations and booster vaccinations.
All I can say is "wow." The people who wrote this paper are clearly drinking the Kool-Aid on their interpretation of what their study ways.
They also wrote this (which is purely speculative with no information behind it as noted in the italics were my addition):
The negative estimates in the final period arguably suggest different behaviour and/or exposure patterns in the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts causing underestimation of the VE. This was likely the consequence of Omicron spreading rapidly initially through single (super-spreading) events causing many infections among young, vaccinated individuals.
This paper should exist a wake up telephone call: the vaccines do not work. End repeating the insanity.
Early treatments similar the Fareed and Tyson protocol are 10X improve than any new therapy, they don't "hook you," and they don't cause disability or death.
If doctors started prescribing the Fareed and Tyson protocol, we'd have well-nigh no deaths, and few hospitalizations. But they can't do that since medical board will take away the licenses of whatsoever physicians who prescribe ivermectin, etc. This is happening now.
We are in this mess because the NIH, CDC, FDA are decadent and incompetent and they volition not agree themselves answerable in an open fence. This has been going on for 20 years in the vaccine space… it'south nothing new. The volume "Evidence of harm" documents all of this. Kirby was deliberately neutral in his presentation (being non-judgmental like reporters are supposed to be), but any neutral thinking person volition side against the authorities.
Why the paper went viral
So, the reason this paper went viral is because
-
Information technology is well done,
-
It was done by PhDs in infectious illness and epidemiology,
-
The results show what is really happening, and
-
Nobody has been able to attack the paper with a apparent argument, even on Twitter.
-
It confirms what my team of experts has been saying almost negative VE
Here are some of the ridiculous attempts to discredit the newspaper:
Supporting evidence
The paper isn't a fluke. There is lots of other evidence in support of the negative VE (and not supporting their speculative explanation for it).
Here'southward the information from Canada which shows that we have information technology backwards. We should be mandating "no vaccines" in society to go on your task and fire all the vaccinated people considering these people are the well-nigh risky.
In Ontario in the last few days, cases per capita among the vaccinated accept skyrocketed above cases per capita among the unvaccinated. Clearly, mandates are nonsensical at this point, because the entire case for restricting unvaccinated people is their presumed higher per capita infection charge per unit.
Hither's the UK information showing the same thing. We demand to flip around the mandates ASAP.
Other supporting data:
-
On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable show of their causative part in deaths after vaccination and the video nigh that paper. If the vaccines don't kill yous, they volition exit you weaker. Over 90% of the deaths investigated afterwards vaccination were constitute to have been caused past the vaccines. At that place is no other explanation.
-
The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-ii reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses
An excellent article by Jessica Rose which explains the underlying mechanism for why we are seeing the consequence that the more you lot vaccinate, the more you make things worse for people. The vaccine damages both your adaptive and innate allowed systems. -
Vaccine efficacy declines to be negative in the UK (Betrayal article)
-
Booster protection fades within x weeks confronting Omicron: UK study
-
Booster shots protect against symptomatic Omicron infection for well-nigh 10 weeks, study finds — which could mean more doses for some in 2022
-
This substack article looks at the Danish study (described here) and the United kingdom data. Note that the VE numbers in the two studies are different considering if you separate our Omicron, you get a very unlike picture of VE compared to analyses that don't divide out VE past variant.
-
Dr. Ron Brown – Opinion Editorial
December 23, 2021
Ontario, Canada reported 5,790 new COVID-nineteen cases on Th, December 23, 2021, setting the province'south ane-day record for new cases since the outset of the pandemic: Ontario: Example numbers | COVID-19. Thursday'south numbers include 971 unvaccinated new cases compared to four,392 fully vaccinated new cases—a rapidly rising trend over the past several weeks conspicuously showing that virtually new cases are now occurring in fully vaccinated people.
Please help the states to spread the word by sharing this article on social media.
Source: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-study-shows-vaccines-must-be
0 Response to "Can You Write an Equation That Gives the Worst-case Response Time, Given N Jobs?"
Post a Comment